Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 13:21:27 GMT 10
When all these issues are evaluated together; Since the right to file a lawsuit in a divorce case based on abandonment belongs only to the abandoned spouse, in the clear words of the law, the spouse who forces the other spouse to leave the common residence or prevents him from returning to the common residence does not have the right to file a divorce case based on abandonment, since he is the abandoning spouse. In the evaluation of the concrete event; Although the lawsuit filed by the court was rejected, stating that the plaintiff, who forced his wife to leave the common residence, did not have the right to file a lawsuit, the decision was overturned by the Special Chamber, stating that the case should be accepted on the grounds that "the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason."
When all these issues are evaluated together; Since the right France Telegram Number Data to file a lawsuit in a divorce case based on abandonment belongs only to the abandoned spouse, in the clear words of the law, the spouse who forces the other spouse to leave the common residence or prevents him from returning to the common residence does not have the right to file a divorce case based on abandonment, since he is the abandoning spouse.
In the evaluation of the concrete event; Although the lawsuit filed by the court was rejected, stating that the plaintiff, who forced his wife to leave the common residence, did not have the right to file a lawsuit, the decision was overturned by the Special Chamber, stating that the case should be accepted on the grounds that "the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason."
When all these issues are evaluated together; Since the right France Telegram Number Data to file a lawsuit in a divorce case based on abandonment belongs only to the abandoned spouse, in the clear words of the law, the spouse who forces the other spouse to leave the common residence or prevents him from returning to the common residence does not have the right to file a divorce case based on abandonment, since he is the abandoning spouse.
In the evaluation of the concrete event; Although the lawsuit filed by the court was rejected, stating that the plaintiff, who forced his wife to leave the common residence, did not have the right to file a lawsuit, the decision was overturned by the Special Chamber, stating that the case should be accepted on the grounds that "the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason."